Normal HRV by age
What counts as a "normal" HRV depends heavily on your age. Here are approximate population ranges — and why your own baseline matters more than any of them.
The short answer
Heart rate variability declines steadily with age, so there is no single "normal" HRV. In healthy people, HRV tends to be highest in the late teens and twenties and falls gradually across each subsequent decade as vagal (parasympathetic) tone decreases. This age-related decline is well documented in the reference review by Shaffer & Ginsberg (2017).
The two metrics you will see most often are SDNN (standard deviation of normal beat-to-beat intervals — the metric Apple Watch reports) and RMSSD (root mean square of successive differences, which more directly reflects vagal activity). Both are measured in milliseconds (ms).
Approximate HRV by age band
The table below gives rough, population-level ranges for short-term / overnight-style measurements — the kind a wearable like Apple Watch produces. Treat them as orientation only.
| Age band | Typical SDNN (ms) | Typical RMSSD (ms) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18–24 | ~55–105 | ~50–95 | Highest |
| 25–34 | ~50–95 | ~40–85 | High |
| 35–44 | ~40–85 | ~30–70 | Declining |
| 45–54 | ~35–75 | ~25–60 | Declining |
| 55–64 | ~30–65 | ~20–50 | Lower |
| 65+ | ~25–55 | ~15–45 | Lowest |
Important: These are approximate, illustrative population ranges synthesized from the HRV norms literature — not diagnostic thresholds and not medical advice. Individual variation is very large, healthy people fall outside these bands routinely, and measurement method (5-minute vs overnight vs 24-hour, resting vs active) strongly affects the numbers. A reading outside a band is not a problem in itself.
Why HRV declines with age
The main driver is a gradual fall in parasympathetic (vagal) tone and a loss of autonomic flexibility as we age. The heart's beat-to-beat responsiveness becomes more rigid, so the variability shrinks. This is a normal part of aging rather than a disease process. The practical takeaway: the goal is not to match a 25-year-old's HRV, but to keep yours as healthy as possible for your age — and to notice when your own trend changes.
Why your baseline beats any chart
Because absolute HRV varies so widely between individuals, a table can only orient you. Two equally healthy 40-year-olds might sit at 45 ms and 90 ms. What is far more informative is your typical range and how it moves. A steady climb over weeks usually reflects improving recovery; a sustained drop signals accumulating stress load, poor sleep, overtraining, illness, or heavy alcohol use.
Factors that shift your numbers night to night include sleep quality and timing, alcohol, late meals, hard training, illness, and psychological stress — the same stressors that also drive cortisol. If you want to raise your baseline, see how to improve your HRV.
How Cortisol+ uses your age-adjusted HRV
Cortisol+ reads your overnight HRV (SDNN) from Apple Watch and interprets it against your own rolling baseline rather than a generic chart. Combined with resting heart rate and sleep, it estimates the pattern and trend of your cortisol over time — not a direct hormone level. That personal-baseline approach is exactly why it stays useful whether your natural HRV runs high or low for your age. See HRV stress monitoring.
Sources
- Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front Public Health. 2017;5:258. PMC5624990 — contains reference norm tables and documents the age-related decline in HRV.
- Kim HG, Cheon EJ, Bai DS, Lee YH, Koo BH. Stress and Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature. Psychiatry Investig. 2018;15(3):235–245. PMC6111105